I chose to read Christina Sell’s “Yoga from the Inside Out” for my first required post about memoirs.
I’m not sure what I was expecting before I opened this book, but I certainly wasn’t expecting to learn, in the first few sentences, that the author was sexually abused as a child. This shocked me and I had to set the book down for a few minutes after reading just the first paragraph. I can’t even imagine what an impact such a traumatic experience would have on someone’s life.
I want to focus on a few things that really jumped out at me throughout the book. First, the internalization of feeling judged at all times. Not only did Sell feel judged at all times, she felt that anything less than perfection was horrible and that everything was a competition. I think this is an issue more common than most people would think.
Many children that play sports feel this way, whether it be from judges, coaches, parents or their teammates. Everyone on the Little League basketball team knows who the good players are. I remember when I played basketball as a kid; I was under no illusions that I could even be considered decent. I was horrible at basketball and teammates/coaches made that clear at practices and as I sat on the bench during games; I was only played the minimum amount that the league required each kid to be played. I don’t think this experience scarred me, but it certainly had a negative impact on my self-esteem as a kid.
Further, the feelings of being judged and believing that everything is a competition are not limited to sports, it also happens in the classroom. In 1st grade, my teachers began picking out the ‘smart’ kids and putting them in different English and Math classes. I was always in these classes and I liked knowing that I was smarter than other people, even at such an early age. Looking back, I think that I was also given a leg-up over ‘normal’ students because the teachers that taught the ‘smart’ classes were much nicer and better at teaching, so in addition to being smarter, we also got better teachers, which furthered the gap between the ‘normal’ and ‘smart’ students. In addition to the ‘smart’ classes, there was even a sort of secret club where the really smart students got taken out of classes to go learn more interesting/difficult material. I think it was called the GT (Gifted and Talented) Program and you had to test into the program. I was in this too, but the only things I recall learning in it was doing multiplication earlier than other students, the metric system and Roman numerals. It was nice to feel superior to almost all of my fellow classmates; the only ones that were my true peers were in the GT Program.
However, as a downside, I – and many others that were in similar situations – see the classroom as another arena for competition. Look at Ivy League students; their entire lives, they’ve known they are smart. They’re 4.0 GPA students, valedictorians, volunteers, mission-trip workers, musicians, and all number of other things. They’re used to being better than everyone around them because, from kindergarten to high-school graduation, they probably were the most gifted/intelligent/etc. person in any given classroom. That all changes once they’re in a classroom of other Ivy League students; it’s fairly well documented that these students are extremely competitive and a surprisingly large number end up dropping out of college, not because they cannot do the work, but because they no longer feel like the smartest person in the room. If it wasn’t a sad phenomenon, it would almost be funny. These are Ivy League students doing well in classes – and are all but guaranteed a great, high-paying job – but they drop out because they no longer feel special compared to their peers, but in reality, they are still extremely well-off and much more intelligent than students at state schools. These are people that constantly compare themselves to others and only see their own shortcomings instead of noticing the areas in which they personally excel.
Sell also writes about the difficulties of seeing someone’s effort instead of their shortcomings. I think this is very interesting and it’s another overlooked quality in today’s society, particularly in religious circles. One of the largest problems I have with today’s Christianity is its condemning nature. It seems more focused on the ‘law’ instead of on Jesus’ love. What good does it do to condemn someone that made a mistake? What if that person is in the process of making a serious change in their lifestyle and has been succeeding most of the time and just happens to get ‘caught’ slipping up a little? Shouldn’t that person be praised for making positive changes or eliminating negative habits instead of being condemned for slipping up on something? It seems like encouraging people would, almost without exception, be the better decision.
One other thing that I thought was particularly interesting was Sell’s discussion about the ‘yoga industry.’ I think it’s incredible how blind corporations can be when it comes to making profit. I understand that they’re out to make money and people need to make a living, but it just seems so dirty exploit yoga as some sort of fitness trend that only the hottest/most athletic people participate in. Corporations that are marketing yoga as some sort of quick route to toned legs or rock-hard abs seem to be completely missing the point of yoga and are just looking to make as much money off of yoga as they can. It’s even stranger when one considers that yoga encourages the renunciation of material goods.